Breaking News
recent

The Irony of a Word and its Misguided Battle

Article by Nathan Durec

Before the controversies that erupted last year over the use of the word, I had never heard it before. Yid. While a Tottenham supporter and fan, I do not hail from the northeast of London, am not Jewish, and do not have a history in referring to myself as part of an “Army” of any sort. As the FA ramped up their vocal opposition to such chants, I have watched more with interest to what the responses would be from all sides of the debate. Even Prime Minister Cameron has now had his say.

The history of the term “yid” in the context of Tottenham Hotspur is one of controversy. There is no denying it. The club’s strong Jewish support in the early part of the 20th Century made fans a target for anti-Semitic slurs from other clubs’ supporters. The goal in adopting the term as a badge of honour was meant to take ownership of the word, to change its meaning, and to re-brand its power. At the time and with the supporters who were involved in the process, that is commendable. It takes courage to stand in front of anti-Semitism, racism, homophobia, misogyny, and any other form of social division. I applaud these early pioneers of non-violent protest.

However, I must ask if this is still the case today. Are the people who are trying to re-brand the term synonymous with those who attempted it 100 years ago? Many of the supporters who argue that their intention in using it as a positive cannot say they belong to the original group its derogatory use was for. When other supporter groups used it against Spurs fans way back when, it was because they were Jewish people who happened to cheer for Tottenham. Specifically, this term would have been used at White Hart Lane and elsewhere, down at the pub, or just walking down the street. It was not specific to football.

The reclaiming of a word or symbol is normally done within the group that is being oppressed by it. I highly doubt a white guy would use the N-word and then argue that he was trying to re-brand it for a positive use. That’s an audacious statement. Similar could be said for those who are trying to reclaim the swastika for its original message, as a symbol of peace. The one thing both of these examples have in common is that the people trying to reclaim them are those who had the original control of its message.

I find it strange that some want to hold onto the term as a reference to the club when its usage was against a people. Not only are some supporters trying to reclaim the word in a positive light, they are also trying to change its entire means away from being Jewish and to one of being a supporter of a football club, sort of as an all-inclusive chant. Commendable? Maybe. Probable. Not likely.

Tottenham Hotspur is a global club. Yes, their roots are deep within London and their support within the Jewish community, but it has become much larger than this. I agree that it should be all-inclusive, but a reference to a specific group of people, especially in such a derogatory manner, I wonder why there is a need to taunt. It was used to taunt Spurs supporters historically. We are better than this behaviour.

Hotspur. Spurs. Lilywhites. There are many other completely acceptable references for supporters of our famed club. Why is there a need to throw into someone’s face, “Hey! Remember when you called us Yids? Well now we wear that badge with honour!” Perhaps it’s just me, but I don’t see the honour it demeaning a people, regardless of well intentions.

It is a simple act to stop using the word as a club reference. Yet, it may mean the world to my Jewish neighbour. That’s fine by me.
 
Comment on this article below!
 
Get the latest football news, articles written by other fans plus match commentary - follow our Twitter feed at www.twitter.com/e_footballnet

We are also looking for Writers to join our established team and Admins for the following e-Football Twitter accounts:

e-Manchester United

e-West Ham
e-Fulham

e-Crystal Palace
e-Chelsea

e-Manchester City

e-Liverpool


This is a great chance for aspiring football journalists to gain exposure and join the e-Football Family! email e-football@live.co.uk


Other e-Football Sites:

e
-Football:
Site -
www.efootballnet.blogspot.com
Twitter Feed - www.twitter.com/e_footballnet
Facebook Page - https://www.facebook.com/pages/E-football/529821593719736 
Forum -
www.e-football.freeforums.net

e-Spurs:
Site -
www.espurs.blogspot.com
Twitter Feed - www.twitter.com/e_spurs
Facebook - www.facebook.com/pages/ESPURS/164631843709508

e-Manchester United:
Twitter Feed -
www.twitter.com/e_ManchesterUnited
Facebook Page -
https://www.facebook.com/pages/e-Manchester-United/202927566530790

e-Arsenal:
Twitter Feed -
www.twitter.com/e_arsenalnet


e-Crystal Palace:
Twitter Feed -
www.twitter.com/e_crystalpalace


e-Middlesbrough:
Twitter Feed - www.twitter.com/e_middlesbrough


e-Ajax:
Twitter Feed - www.twitter.com/e_ajax


e-Eredivisie:
Twitter Feed - www.twitter.com/e_eredivisie


e-Ligat Ha'Al:
Twitter Feed - www.twitter.com/e_ligat_HaAl


e-La Liga:
Twitter Feed - www.twitter.com/e_LaLiga

7 comments:

  1. The original use of the word is a greeting to a friend of the jewish faith, or even calling themselves Yids, don't say we are being anti-Semitic by saying this.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "Before the controversies that erupted last year over the use of the word, I had never heard it before. Yid. While a Tottenham supporter and fan"... story from the armchair, YID is taken from the terraces something you will not understand

    ReplyDelete
  3. I am a Spurs fan and I totally agree. It doesn't matter whether it is used positively, it is a racist term appropriated by fans who are by and large not Jewish, and encourages disgraceful racism from other fans. It would make no difference to Spurs supporters to change 'Yid' army to 'white' or some other variation. I don't care if most view it as a badge of honour. Find another badge of honour that doesn't have disgusting connotations and insults a race. The tribalistic view that you can behave however you want -- as demonstrated by recent Spurs chants -- is not acceptable. Spurs fans: would it not be better for us to take the moral high ground, ban the word and watch other clubs be punished for continuing to use it? Why cling on to this nasty relic? It tarnishes the club and its supporters, and breeds hate and violence.

    ReplyDelete
  4. MARTYN1672: That is a poor attempt to legitimise its use. The reason it has been adopted by Spurs fans is BECAUSE the term is a pejorative used by antisemites, and in turn used by other clubs' fans to abuse Spurs.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I can tell you with first hand knowledge that these chants have been used for at least 40 years and therefore you are wrong to use the present tense to suggest that Spurs fans are in the process of reclaiming the word. It is rather a continuing legacy of those early 20th century fans, who in light of your article one would assume to be delighted if they were alive to hear it now. The problem arose thanks to the double standards displayed last season, following the West Ham supporters using the word against us. This led to many Spurs fans stating that whilst we are not in any way anti semetic in using the word in the football arena, the West Ham fans were clearly genuinely anti semetic in their vile chants that were contained to that same stadium. This opened up the super highway the anti brigade to have a field day. No win here, can you imagine Peter Herbert`s reaction if we changed our chant to `white army`.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I am a Tottenham supporter for many years and remember being called a Yid back in the 60`s even as I am not of the jewish faith, but I have also been called "Whitey" do we now have to stop using the "W" word, this should be put in context David Badiel was a famous person once, now he is C list seeking publicity. So why does he not go on SCD or IaaCGMOOH.
    Enjoy the word puzzle

    ReplyDelete
  7. Words have no meaning except in context and history. Yid, when used as an insult, is an offensive word to many jews and non jews alike. But so is queer or nigga or dyke or poof......but there is the tv programme queer eye for a straight guy, a band called NWA, a cycling group called dykes on bikes (honestly) and Graham Nortons house band was 4 Poofs and a Piano. Should they all be told to change their name or threatened with prosecution? Will David Baddiels beloved Chelsea sack their racist captain and if we stop singing yid army will the cretins at west ham and chelsea say "ok...now youve stopped calling yourself yids we will stop singing about Hitler Auschwitz and imitating the sound of escaping
    gas?" Let the racists be the first to change their sick tunes.....not the targets of their filth.

    ReplyDelete

Powered by Blogger.